Value of Strain Elastography Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses with Histopathological Correlation

Main Article Content

Mahbuba Azim Moonmoon
M. N. Rubaia Islam Bony
Md. Ubaidul Islam
Parbati Devnath
Nahid Safrin


Introduction: Breast cancer is currently one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in women. Early detection and accurate classification of suspicious masses as benign or malignant is important for arriving at an appropriate treatment plan. Elastography has shown potential in differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors.

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of Strain Elastography ultrasound in differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses taken histopathology as Gold Standard.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Radiology and Imaging, BIRDEM, Dhaka, from July 2017 to June 2019. A total of 92 female patients with breast masses were enrolled in this study. Strain Elastography Ultrasound and histopathology were done in all these patients. Statistical analyses of the results were obtained by using window-based computer software devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-22).

Results: The validity test of B-mode ultrasonography for differentiation of benign and malignant breast mass has sensitivity 95.0%, specificity 71.2%, accuracy 81.5% and positive predictive value 71.7% and negative predictive value 94.9%. Strain Score has sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 92.3%, accuracy 89.1%, positive predictive value 89.5% and negative predictive value 88.9%. Strain ratio has sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 94.2%, accuracy 91.3%, positive predictive value 92.1% and negative predictive value 90.7%. The validity test of Combined (B-mode sonography and Elastography) has sensitivity 97.5%, specificity 96.2%, accuracy 96.7%, positive predictive value 95.1% and negative predictive value 98.0%. The areas under the curve (AUCs) from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.948 for ACR-BIRADS classification, 0.986 for Strain Score, 0.956 for Strain Ratio and 0.990 for combination.

Conclusion: The combination of strain elastography with B-mode ultrasonography has the potential to improve the differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.

Breast, elastography, strain ratio, ultrasound, masses.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moonmoon, M. A., Bony, M. N. R. I., Islam, M. U., Devnath, P., & Safrin, N. (2020). Value of Strain Elastography Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses with Histopathological Correlation. Journal of Cancer and Tumor International, 10(1), 17-25.
Original Research Article


Mutala TM, Ndaiga P, Aywak A. Comparison of qualitative and semi-quantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy. Cancer Imaging. 2016;16(1):12.

Xu H, Rao M, Varghese T, Sommer A, Baker S, Hall TJ, Sisney GA, Burnside ES. Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2010;36(11):1813-1824.

Atabey AO, Arıbal E, Ergelen R, Kaya H. Value of strain elastography ultrasound in differentiation of breast masses and histopathologic correlation. The Journal of Breast Health. 2014;10(4):234.

Xu H, Varghese T, Jiang J, Zagzebski JA. In vivo classification of breast masses using features derived from axial-strain and axial-shear images. Ultrasonic Imaging. 2012;34(4):222-236.

Ozsoy A, Acar D, Barca AN, Aktas H, Araz L, Ozkaraoglu O, Yuksel E. Diagnostic performance of real-time strain sonoelastography in BI-RADS 4 and 5 breast masses. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2016;97(9):883-889.

Olgun DÇ, Korkmazer B, Kılıç F, Dikici AS, Velidedeoğlu M, Aydoğan F, Kantarcı F, Yılmaz MH. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2014;20(3):239.

Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013;201(2):347-356.

Stachs A, Hartmann S, Stubert J, Dieterich M, Martin A, Kundt G, Reimer T, Gerber B. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: Factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound. 2013;34(02):131-136.

Fleury EDFC. The importance of breast elastography added to the BI-RADS lexicon classification. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2015; 61(4):313-316.

Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: A multicenter trial. Journal of Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(2):281–287.

Kumar N, Prasad J. Epidemiology of benign breast lumps, is it changing: A prospective study. International Surgery Journal. 2019;6(2):465-469.

Chao TC, Chao HH, Chen MF. Sonographic features of breast hamartomas. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2007;26(4):447-452.

Howlett DC, Marchbank NDP, Allan SM. Sonographic assessment of the symptomatic breast– A pictorial review. Journal of Diagnostic Radiography and Imaging. Institute of Advanced Medical Education. Breast elastography: Principles of Strain and Shear-Wave Elastography. Online CME. 2003;5(1).
(Accessed 19 Apr 2016)

Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: Sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy— clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology. 2009;250(1):41-49.

Yang WT, Chang J, Metreweli C. Patients with breast cancer: Differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. Radiology. 2000;215(2):568-573.

Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: Comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008;191(2):604-610.